|
Rasmussen Reports Home
Daily Snapshot
Most Recent Releases
Scott's Page
GOP Generation-2004
Daily Updates
Bush Job Approval
Economic--3-Day Tracking
Rasmussen Index Summary
Ratings--U.S. Economy
Ratings--Personal Finance
Economy--Better/Worse
Personal--Better/Worse
U.S. in Recession?
Economic--7-Day Tracking
Rasmussen Index Summary
Ratings--U.S. Economy
Ratings--Personal Finance
Economy--Better/Worse
Personal--Better/Worse
U.S. in Recession?
Other Updates
Bush Ratings--Economy
Bush Ratings--Iraq
Is U.S. Winning War on
Terror?
Election 2004 Summary
Welcome
|
|
Survey of 1,500 Adults Aug 12-140-11
Results from
Prior Survey
|
August 12 - 14, 2005 |
How important is it for the United States to become less
dependent on oil imports? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How important is it for the United States to become less
dependent on oil imports? |
|
|
|
|
Gender |
3 Party |
< 40 > |
Investors |
Marital Status |
Race |
Age |
Income |
|
▼ Response ▼ |
TOTAL |
Men |
Women |
GOP |
Dem |
Other |
< Men |
Men 40+ |
< Wom |
Wom 40+ |
Inv |
Non |
Married |
Not married |
White |
Black |
Other |
18-29 |
30-39 |
40-49 |
50-64 |
65+ |
< 20k |
20k-40k |
40-60k |
60k-75k |
75k-100k |
100k> |
|
Very important |
69% |
72% |
66% |
74% |
63% |
71% |
68% |
73% |
62% |
68% |
75% |
64% |
74% |
62% |
71% |
64% |
61% |
65% |
68% |
75% |
73% |
64% |
62% |
69% |
70% |
80% |
73% |
76% |
|
Somewhat important |
18% |
19% |
18% |
18% |
18% |
18% |
29% |
16% |
21% |
17% |
18% |
19% |
16% |
23% |
19% |
16% |
18% |
25% |
17% |
18% |
15% |
15% |
19% |
18% |
18% |
18% |
16% |
23% |
|
Not very important |
5% |
4% |
6% |
2% |
8% |
4% |
2% |
5% |
7% |
5% |
3% |
7% |
5% |
5% |
4% |
9% |
8% |
5% |
5% |
5% |
5% |
5% |
7% |
5% |
5% |
1% |
5% |
1% |
|
Not at all important |
1% |
2% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
2% |
1% |
2% |
3% |
1% |
1% |
2% |
1% |
2% |
1% |
1% |
3% |
2% |
2% |
0% |
2% |
1% |
3% |
1% |
1% |
0% |
1% |
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 12 - 14, 2005 |
If the price of oil remains high, will companies produce more
alternative sources of energy to reduce costs for consumers? |
|
|
|
If the price of oil remains high, will companies produce more
alternative sources of energy to reduce costs for consumers? |
|
Gender |
3 Party |
< 40 > |
Investors |
Marital Status |
Race |
Age |
Income |
|
▼ Response ▼ |
TOTAL |
Men |
Women |
GOP |
Dem |
Other |
< Men |
Men 40+ |
< Wom |
Wom 40+ |
Inv |
Non |
Married |
Not married |
White |
Black |
Other |
18-29 |
30-39 |
40-49 |
50-64 |
65+ |
< 20k |
20k-40k |
40-60k |
60k-75k |
75k-100k |
100k> |
|
Yes |
42% |
46% |
39% |
51% |
35% |
40% |
55% |
43% |
37% |
39% |
46% |
38% |
42% |
41% |
42% |
43% |
39% |
46% |
47% |
37% |
44% |
34% |
40% |
35% |
44% |
53% |
47% |
56% |
|
No |
29% |
33% |
25% |
22% |
33% |
32% |
33% |
33% |
31% |
23% |
25% |
32% |
29% |
28% |
28% |
27% |
36% |
32% |
26% |
30% |
30% |
23% |
31% |
31% |
28% |
22% |
32% |
26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 12 - 14, 2005 |
Which is more important in the long run…conserving energy or
developing new sources of energy? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which is more important in the long run…conserving energy or
developing new sources of energy? |
|
|
Gender |
3 Party |
< 40 > |
Investors |
Marital Status |
Race |
Age |
Income |
|
▼ Response ▼ |
TOTAL |
Men |
Women |
GOP |
Dem |
Other |
< Men |
Men 40+ |
< Wom |
Wom 40+ |
Inv |
Non |
Married |
Not married |
White |
Black |
Other |
18-29 |
30-39 |
40-49 |
50-64 |
65+ |
< 20k |
20k-40k |
40-60k |
60k-75k |
75k-100k |
100k> |
|
Conserving energy |
26% |
23% |
29% |
22% |
32% |
26% |
31% |
21% |
41% |
26% |
25% |
27% |
25% |
30% |
25% |
32% |
33% |
36% |
18% |
27% |
24% |
25% |
35% |
25% |
20% |
25% |
23% |
21% |
|
Developing new sources |
64% |
69% |
60% |
69% |
59% |
64% |
59% |
71% |
50% |
63% |
68% |
61% |
67% |
59% |
66% |
53% |
61% |
54% |
70% |
65% |
69% |
63% |
52% |
64% |
72% |
65% |
74% |
76% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 12 - 14, 2005 |
Suppose the United States had to choose between relying on oil
imports from the Middle East or building new nuclear power
plants…which would you prefer? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gender |
3 Party |
< 40 > |
Investors |
Marital Status |
Race |
Age |
Income |
|
▼ Response ▼ |
TOTAL |
Men |
Women |
GOP |
Dem |
Other |
< Men |
Men 40+ |
< Wom |
Wom 40+ |
Inv |
Non |
Married |
Not married |
White |
Black |
Other |
18-29 |
30-39 |
40-49 |
50-64 |
65+ |
< 20k |
20k-40k |
40-60k |
60k-75k |
75k-100k |
100k> |
|
Relying on oil imports |
19% |
14% |
22% |
19% |
19% |
18% |
21% |
12% |
31% |
20% |
16% |
20% |
18% |
19% |
19% |
15% |
20% |
26% |
20% |
21% |
13% |
10% |
21% |
21% |
17% |
17% |
18% |
10% |
|
New nuclear power plants |
54% |
66% |
43% |
61% |
50% |
48% |
62% |
66% |
37% |
44% |
62% |
47% |
56% |
50% |
55% |
51% |
49% |
49% |
53% |
51% |
60% |
55% |
46% |
52% |
56% |
60% |
62% |
75% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 12 - 14, 2005 |
The United States has 103 nuclear power plants in operation
generating 20% of the nation's electricity. However, no nuclear
plants have been built since the 1970s. Is it time for the
United States to begin building nuclear power plants again? |
|
|
|
|
Gender |
3 Party |
< 40 > |
Investors |
Marital Status |
Race |
Age |
Income |
|
▼ Response ▼ |
TOTAL |
Men |
Women |
GOP |
Dem |
Other |
< Men |
Men 40+ |
< Wom |
Wom 40+ |
Inv |
Non |
Married |
Not married |
White |
Black |
Other |
18-29 |
30-39 |
40-49 |
50-64 |
65+ |
< 20k |
20k-40k |
40-60k |
60k-75k |
75k-100k |
100k> |
|
Yes |
55% |
64% |
46% |
63% |
52% |
47% |
66% |
64% |
48% |
46% |
60% |
51% |
56% |
54% |
55% |
62% |
49% |
56% |
52% |
48% |
61% |
57% |
54% |
51% |
58% |
54% |
58% |
64% |
|
No |
24% |
22% |
25% |
18% |
26% |
29% |
27% |
20% |
27% |
25% |
21% |
26% |
22% |
26% |
24% |
19% |
26% |
27% |
24% |
29% |
21% |
14% |
24% |
27% |
23% |
25% |
21% |
24% |
|