|Does the United States need stricter gun control laws?|
|How would you rate the way in which the University handled the incident?|
Following Virginia Tech Shooting, 45% Say U.S. Needs Stricter Gun Control Laws
Support for stricter gun control laws has increased following the tragedy at Virginia Tech. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 45% of American adults now say the country needs stricter gun control laws while 37% disagree. The last time Rasmussen Reports asked that question, following Dick Cheney’s hunting accident, just 39% said stricter gun control laws were needed while 52% were opposed.
Thirty-seven percent (37%) of men and 52% of women now say that stricter laws are needed. Support for stricter laws is higher among Americans over 50 than it is among younger adults. There is also a strong partisan difference—63% of Democrats want stricter gun control laws. That view is shared by just 29% of Republicans and 39% of those who are not affiliated with either major political party. (More Below)
The decline in opposition to stricter laws—from 52% a year ago to 37% today--is particularly striking among men. In the February 2006 survey, 65% of men said stricter laws were not needed. That figure has fallen to 44% today.
Rasmussen Reports will ask the same poll question again in a few weeks to see whether the increased support for stricter laws is a temporary reaction to the horrific news from Virginia or a lasting change.
Seventy-four percent (74%) say they have been following news of the Virginia Tech shootings closely, including 40% who say they have followed it Very Closely. Sixty percent (60%) say they have said a prayer for the victims and their families.
Thirty-seven percent (37%) say the University did a good or excellent job handling the situation. Thirty-three percent (33%) say fair and 16% say poor.
The latest public reaction to events in the news can be found by visiting the Rasmussen Reports home page.
Rasmussen Reports also provides continuously updated ratings for Members of Congress, Other Political Figures, and Journalists and a daily update of the President’s Job Approval. Election 2008 coverage includes a weekly update of the Democratic and Republican Presidential nominating contests and continuous updates on general election match-ups, favorability ratings, and ideological perceptions for all Democratic and Republican candidates.
Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
The Rasmussen Reports ElectionEdge™ Premium Service for Election 2008 offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a Presidential election.
Rasmussen Reports’ Election 2006 coverage has been praised for its accuracy and reliability. Michael Barone, Senior Writer for U.S. News & World Report and co-author of The Almanac of American Politics, mentions, “One clear lesson from the Republican victory of 2004 and the Democratic victory of 2006 is that the best place to look for polls that are spot on is RasmussenReports.com." And University of Virginia Professor Larry Sabato states, “In election campaigns, I’ve learned to look for the Rasmussen results. In my experience, they are right on the money. There is no question Rasmussen produces some of the most accurate and reliable polls in the country today.”
Rasmussen Reports was also the nation's most accurate polling firm during the 2004 Presidential election and the only one to project both Bush and Kerry's vote total within half a percentage point of the actual outcome.
During both Election 2004 and Election 2006, RasmussenReports.com was the top-ranked public opinion research site on the web. We had twice as many visitors as our nearest competitor and nearly as many as all competitors combined.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.