|Election 2006: New Jersey Senate|
|Bob Menendez (D)||48%|
|Tom Kean, Jr. (R)||43%|
|Election 2006: New Jersey Senate
Three-Poll Rolling Average
|Oct 11-Oct 25-Nov||42%||44%|
|Sep-Oct 11-Oct 25||41%||41%|
|Election 2006: New Jersey Senate|
In the latest Rasmussen Reports election poll of New Jersey’s Likely Voters, appointed Democratic Senator Menendez is now leading Republican Tom Kean, Jr. 48% to 43% (see crosstabs).
The survey suggests a distinct lack of enthusiasm for both candidates. Among Kean voters, just 45% say they’ll be casting a vote for Kean, while an equal percentage say they be voting against Menendez.
Among the incumbent’s supporters, 59% are casting a positive vote for him while 38% are voting against Kean.
This lack of enthusiasm for the candidates, combined with the GOP's national funk, may enable state's Democratic proclivities to carry the incumbent to victory for a term of his own in the Senate. Rasmussen Reports is shifting the race from “Toss-up” to "Leans Democrat" in our Senate Balance of Power summary.
Senator Menendez is viewed favorably by 49% and unfavorably by 47%. This includes 14% with a “very favorable” opinion of their Senator and 31% with a “very unfavorable” view.
Kean is viewed favorably by 44%, and unfavorably by 51%.
Moreover, on the paramount issue of this election, the war in Iraq, voters are almost evenly divided over which candidate they trust more: 43% say Kean, 42% say Menendez. On the economy, the division is 43% and 43%.
Just 19% of New Jersey voters rate the situation in Iraq as good or excellent. Twenty-two percent (22%) say fair and 58% poor. Forty-four percent (44%) say the economy is in good or excellent shape.
Fifty-two percent (52%) of all voters believe New Jersey is more corrupt than other states; 44% say it's "about the same." Democrats are much more likely to say that the level of corruption is "about the same." Few in any group believe Jersey is "less corrupt."
Both Menendez and Kean have been tarred with charges of corruption and ethical lapses, but it seems more of the tar has been sticking to the incumbent.
Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
The Rasmussen Reports ElectionEdge™ Premium Service for Election 2008 offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a Presidential election.
Rasmussen Reports’ Election 2006 coverage has been praised for its accuracy and reliability. Michael Barone, Senior Writer for U.S. News & World Report and co-author of The Almanac of American Politics, mentions, “One clear lesson from the Republican victory of 2004 and the Democratic victory of 2006 is that the best place to look for polls that are spot on is RasmussenReports.com." And University of Virginia Professor Larry Sabato states, “In election campaigns, I’ve learned to look for the Rasmussen results. In my experience, they are right on the money. There is no question Rasmussen produces some of the most accurate and reliable polls in the country today.”
Rasmussen Reports was also the nation's most accurate polling firm during the 2004 Presidential election and the only one to project both Bush and Kerry's vote total within half a percentage point of the actual outcome.
During both Election 2004 and Election 2006, RasmussenReports.com was the top-ranked public opinion research site on the web. We had twice as many visitors as our nearest competitor and nearly as many as all competitors combined.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.