Election 2006: Montana Senate
|Jon Tester (D)||50%|
|Conrad Burns (R)||46%|
|Election 2006: Montana Senate
Three-Poll Rolling Average
|Oct 18-Oct 26-Nov 1||50%||46%|
|Oct 11-Oct 18-Oct 26||49%||45%|
|Sep 20-Oct 11-
|Sep 13-Sep 20-Oct||50%||43%|
|Aug-Sep 13-Sep 20||50%||44%|
|Election 2006: Montana Senate|
Montana Senate: Tester by 4
Tester (D) 50% Burns (R) 46%
Montana offers another Senate race where a Republican who had been closing the gap in the final weeks may be falling a bit short. With only a few days left in the election, Republican Senator Conrad Burns now trails Democrat Jon Tester 50% to 46% (see crosstabs).
Forty-eight percent (48%) are certain they will vote for Tester, 43% are certain they'll pick Burns.
The race now reverts to the "Leans Democrat" column in our Senate Balance of Power summary.
Burdened by scandal, Senator Burns has been struggling all year to stay afloat politically. With one exception he has lagged in each of our last nine polls (in August, the race was a tie). The Senator received more money from disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff than any other Congressman, and Tester and other Democrats in the state weren't about to let the electorate forget it.
Still, most Tester supporters (60%) regard their vote as "for Tester" rather than "against Burns" (32%). Similarly, 66% of Burns supporters see their vote as pro-Burns, 32% as anti-Tester.
Thirty-seven percent (37%) view Burns "very unfavorably." He is viewed favorably by only 46%. Tester is viewed favorably by 53%.
Though this race bears some comparison to New Jersey's Senate contest, and political corruption has been a persistent issue in both, Montana voters are much less likely to say their state suffers more political corruption than most other states. Only 4% believe that is true; 54% say the level of corruption is "about the same," and 36% say Montana is less corrupt than others. The issue is deemed very important by 68%.
In New Jersey, a majority of the state’s voters view their state politics as more corrupt than most.
President Bush earns approval from 48% of voters, which is a little higher than he fetches nationally. Forty percent (40%) "strongly disapprove" of the job he's doing as chief executive.
The President recently visited Montana to rally support for Burns.
Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
The Rasmussen Reports ElectionEdge™ Premium Service for Election 2008 offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a Presidential election.
Rasmussen Reports’ Election 2006 coverage has been praised for its accuracy and reliability. Michael Barone, Senior Writer for U.S. News & World Report and co-author of The Almanac of American Politics, mentions, “One clear lesson from the Republican victory of 2004 and the Democratic victory of 2006 is that the best place to look for polls that are spot on is RasmussenReports.com." And University of Virginia Professor Larry Sabato states, “In election campaigns, I’ve learned to look for the Rasmussen results. In my experience, they are right on the money. There is no question Rasmussen produces some of the most accurate and reliable polls in the country today.”
Rasmussen Reports was also the nation's most accurate polling firm during the 2004 Presidential election and the only one to project both Bush and Kerry's vote total within half a percentage point of the actual outcome.
During both Election 2004 and Election 2006, RasmussenReports.com was the top-ranked public opinion research site on the web. We had twice as many visitors as our nearest competitor and nearly as many as all competitors combined.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.